Sensors disagree.
Radar, passive RF, and cameras observe the same airspace differently. Their detections arrive with different timing, uncertainty, and blind spots.
Qylai associates passive-RF bearings with radar and EO/IR detections into one coherent track picture—so counter-drone systems can follow dense activity without duplicate, conflicting, or unexplained tracks.
Every result is auditable, replayable, and ready for the ATAK and C2 systems customers already use.
One object. Three incomplete views.
Ready for existing C2 and evaluation tools.
Counter-drone teams increasingly combine radar, RF, EO/IR, and cooperative feeds. The hard part is deciding which observations belong to the same object—and proving the resulting track is trustworthy.
Radar, passive RF, and cameras observe the same airspace differently. Their detections arrive with different timing, uncertainty, and blind spots.
Crossings, dropouts, and coordinated motion create duplicate tracks and identity swaps—exactly when the operator needs a stable picture.
When a fused result cannot be replayed or traced to its source observations, buyers cannot compare configurations or explain failures.
Show how a radar, passive-RF, or EO/IR product improves a fused track picture—without building fusion in-house.
Publish scored, provenance-carrying tracks into existing C2, and reproduce every test from the detection log.
It is the RF-native fusion and evidence layer between the sensors and the systems already responsible for decisions and response.
Qylai resolves which observations belong together, combines their uncertainty, and publishes a stable track with the supporting evidence attached.
Existing sensors report partial views of the same airspace, each with its own timing and uncertainty.
Qylai identifies observations of the same object and weights each contribution by what that sensor actually knows.
Existing C2 and evaluation tools receive one coherent track instead of competing sensor reports.
Every fused track points back to the sensor observations that shaped it, so an integrator or evaluator can inspect the evidence instead of trusting a black box.
7E3A—91C47E3A—91C4The same recorded scan sequence recreates the same result. Teams can compare releases, investigate failures, and prove what changed.
Qylai sits between sensors and command systems. Open outputs let customers improve the track picture without replacing maps, workflows, or response tools.
In this known-truth scenario, Qylai produced 47% less aggregate tracking error than the strongest individual sensor. That means a better balance of correct locations, fewer misses, and fewer false tracks.
GOSPA is a standard multi-object tracking score. Lower is better: a system is penalized for wrong locations, missed objects, and false tracks—not just the final object count.
One product surface for sensor OEMs, ATAK operators, and evaluators: associate heterogeneous detections, prove the result, and publish into the stack already in the field.
Associate passive-RF bearings with radar and EO/IR detections into one coherent track—identity preserved through crossings, clutter, and dropouts.
Provenance on every estimate, scan-exact replay from the detection log, and scored evaluation so OEMs and T&E teams can prove what the fused picture actually did.
Publish into ATAK/CoT and open architectures. Sensor OEMs and integrators keep their hardware and C2; Qylai improves the track picture underneath.
Qylai works with counter-UAS OEMs and integrators who need RF-native association, scored replay, and tracks that land in the C2 they already run.
DISCUSS AN INTEGRATION↗